Common options for families to save for their children’s education are through custodial accounts and 529 savings plans. When a couple divorces, the treatment of these resources needs attention. A recent unreported case from the Maryland Court of Special Appeals points this up. This article highlights issues that should be addressed as part of a settlement agreement or, if necessary, in court.
There are two types of custodial accounts, UTMA (Uniform Transfers to Minors Act) and UGMA (Uniform Gifts to Minors Act). UTMA accounts have replaced UGMA accounts in most states and the District of Columbia. Each allows for creation of an account for a specific minor child. An UTMA can hold cash, securities, real estate, and other property. Often a parent is the custodian. The assets in the account belong to the child. The child is entitled to the account assets when he or she reaches age 18 or 21. Income in the account is taxable to the child in the year earned.
A 529 plan is an investment account that grows tax-free. Withdrawals are not taxed if used for qualified higher education expenses, or for elementary or secondary school tuition (the latter limited to $10,000 a year).
In Maryland and Virginia, the legal child support obligation ends when a child reaches age 18 or graduates from high school. A court cannot order a parent to pay for college. In the District of Columbia, the support obligation ends at age 21. A court could order a parent to pay for college, but the child may not finish college before that age. Parties negotiating a marital settlement agreement often wish to include provisions for college expenses. When they do, the terms of settlement should take account of existing custodial or 529 accounts as well as the possibility a parent will create such an account after the divorce.
Because the assets of a custodial account belong to the child, a parent or other custodian must manage the account for the benefit of the child, not the custodian. For example, in the 2021 case of Royzman v. Royzman, a custodian-father withdrew all funds from his daughter’s UTMA account to pay his attorney’s fees in the contested custody case. He argued it was in her best interest that he do so. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals disagreed and affirmed the trial judge, who removed the father as custodian, ordered him to reimburse the UTMA and provide a full accounting to the mother. In a 1990 Maryland case, Brodsky v. Brodsky, the father agreed as part of a divorce settlement to pay for the daughter’s college expenses. To meet his future obligation, he began saving in a custodial account and used these funds to pay for college. In a suit filed by the now-adult daughter, the court ruled the father was wrong to use the UGMA funds. The funds belonged to the daughter; he could not use them to satisfy his own contractual obligation. In both cases, the custodian ran afoul of the law in thinking he could use a child’s custodial funds to meet an obligation of the custodian.
Parties negotiating a divorce settlement that will include an obligation for college can avoid what happened in the Brodsky case by including terms for existing custodial accounts and accounts a parent may create after divorce. For example:
A 529 plan could hold upwards of $300,000. It may be funded with a parent’s separate property, with marital property funds, or with monies from grandparents that they intend for the child’s benefit. Courts in some states have held that a 529 account funded with marital property money and held by a parent is divisible property at divorce. Other courts have held that parents intended the transfer of marital property to a child’s 529 account to be a gift to the child and not divisible. Courts in Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia have yet to address this issue. This uncertainty means divorcing parties should negotiate terms for handling a 529 account to carry out their original intent to provide for education and to avoid future litigation. The marital settlement agreement can include the following:
Divorcing parents should collaborate with their lawyers to build an agreement that fulfills their shared goal of educating their children and that takes appropriate account of existing savings created for that purpose as well as a parent’s post-divorce savings.
In July 2021, at its annual meeting, the Uniform Law Commission adopted the Uniform Cohabitants’ Economic Remedies Act (UCERA). Cohabitants already have the right to enter into a written or oral contract under general contract law principles. If enacted, UCERA would create statutory recognition of these rights and would expand the bases for cohabitant property […]
Virginia has joined Maryland and D.C. in passing the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (the UCLA). The Virginia UCLA will apply to all Virginia family law Collaborative cases starting July 1, 2021. Begun in 1990 as a newcomer to the array of Alternative Dispute Resolution options, Collaborative Law was introduced in the DMV area in 2005 […]
Having served for 10 years on the Council for the Estate and Trust Law Section of the Maryland State Bar Association, I became Chair at the end of June. It is both an honor and a privilege to serve, and it is not lost on me that my term takes place during a worldwide health […]
We don’t often get the question, “Can I disinherit my spouse?” but the subject has been fraught with consternation for Maryland estate planners for many (many, many) years; we used to have to answer it with “it depends.” We will soon have greater certainty—for decedents dying on or after October 1, 2020, it’s going to […]
Trusts are an important tool that families can use to protect assets and pass wealth to future generations. When the beneficiary of a trust is facing divorce, he or she will be concerned that the trust assets and income may be vulnerable to a spousal claim. Such a claim can include equitable division of property, spousal or child support, and an […]