Category: Divorce & Family Law

February 4, 2019

Marital Agreements and Beneficiary Designations—Sometimes Friends and Sometimes Foes

Morriah H. Horani

A marital agreement can take the form of a premarital agreement, a postmarital agreement, or a separation agreement, i.e., an agreement that settles property rights (and other issues) between parties who intend to divorce. A marital agreement may provide for the disposition of assets at death; it may require one or both parties to provide for the other or a child at death after divorce; or it may waive rights at death. When the terms of a marital agreement and a beneficiary designation conflict with each other, the law will either validate or annul the designation, depending on the jurisdiction, the type of asset, and the language of the marital agreement.

The District of Columbia, Virginia, and Maryland all have laws that revoke at divorce either the entire will or the portions benefitting a now-former spouse, but the laws in these jurisdictions do not provide the same rules for beneficiary designations. The choreography between beneficiary designations, divorce, and marital agreements is unique and does not squarely align with laws governing divorce and will revocation.

A conflict can occur when a marital agreement provides for a waiver of claims to the other spouse’s assets at divorce, yet a pre-existing beneficiary designation nominates the former spouse as beneficiary of the asset at death. A general waiver of rights to an equitable distribution of property at divorce—such as the right to share the value of an IRA or the cash value of a life insurance policy—will not ordinarily defeat a beneficiary designation naming the other spouse. For example, many marital settlement agreements waive each party’s rights and interests in the other spouse’s retirement assets. However, when a spouse has named the other as beneficiary of an IRA and the IRA owner does not change the beneficiary, a waiver in a marital agreement of property rights, even a waiver that specifically mentions retirement assets, may not be sufficient to overcome the otherwise valid beneficiary designation.

Maryland and District of Columbia courts have consistently held that a general waiver of property rights in a marital agreement will not nullify a beneficiary designation, nor will a divorce judgment nullify the beneficiary designation. These courts recognize the distinction between a waiver of the automatic right to share in the estate of a deceased spouse (while the parties are still married) and the right to benefits under a beneficiary designation. The owner of the asset has the right to change the beneficiary at any time, the spouse only had an expectancy, not a legal right; a waiver of rights is not a waiver of an expectancy.

A marital agreement must contain an express waiver of an expectancy, if that is what the parties intend, such as a statement that each party expressly waives any rights under a previously-executed beneficiary designation. Parties entering into a premarital agreement may wish to include express-waiver language as to a retirement account that provides for benefits to go to a spouse by default; a Maryland court held that a premarital agreement divested a former spouse of benefits under such a beneficiary designation.

On the other hand, a marital agreement may provide for a surviving spouse or former spouse to receive certain benefits at the other party’s death, such as life insurance or an IRA. If the spouse obligated to provide benefits fails to do so, the survivor’s remedy may be to seek a court ruling that the surviving spouse or former spouse is the true beneficiary, or that requires the named beneficiary to pay over the asset to the rightful owner.

The Virginia Legislature has made some effort to address the problem of the beneficiary designation naming a former spouse who is no longer the intended recipient. Virginia Code §20-111.1 provides that any revocable beneficiary designation for death benefits payable to a former spouse in a prior-existing written contract is automatically revoked at divorce. Benefits will be paid as if the former spouse predeceased the decedent, but only if the payor (the insurance company or other financial institution) receives written notice of revocation by divorce of the beneficiary designation before it distributes the death benefits to the named beneficiary. This provision does not apply if the parties’ settlement agreement provides for another disposition of assets at death, such as for life insurance to be payable to a former spouse. The provision also does not apply to benefits payable to a trust nor to death benefits payable to or under a trust. This law only applies to divorces that occurred on or after July 1, 1993; any beneficiary designation executed before that date is not automatically revoked.

The Virginia statute does not revoke a beneficiary designation under an employer-sponsored life insurance policy as the right to these benefits is governed by a federal statute. It also does not apply to benefits under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance program. These, too, are governed by federal law. In both cases, federal law preempts state law, meaning federal law, not state law, controls. Virginia, in 2012, began requiring divorce decrees to include a notice to the parties that beneficiary designations may not be automatically revoked and that parties should follow provider instructions regarding beneficiary changes.

It is best practice to update one’s estate planning documents or, at least have them reviewed, after a marital separation, and to make appropriate changes to beneficiary designations after execution of a marital agreement and, sometimes, again, after a divorce. Failing to do so may not only produce unintended consequences, but could also result in a costly and bitter dispute amongst family members.


Share
July 19, 2018

Alimony Ends When Payor Spouse Retires . . . Or Does It?

Vicki Viramontes-LaFree

Family lawyers are increasingly hearing from divorced clients who are getting ready to retire or have retired and who have a spousal support obligation or a right to receive support under a court order.  A court order may result from a trial or as part of a settlement agreement adopted by a court in the […]

April 9, 2018

Premarital Agreements, Alimony, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Linda J. Ravdin

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has eliminated the tax treatment of alimony that has been in place for more than 75 years.  Under the old law, alimony is deductible from the income of the payor and includible in the income of the recipient, provided the parties comply with the specific requirements of the Internal […]

April 2, 2018

Impact of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Divorcing Families

Brooke I. Hettig

In December 2017, Congress rushed to pass the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act:  a 503-page document that drastically alters several of the popular tax credits and deductions around which many divorcing families structure their financial planning.  This first major tax reform in decades affects taxes beginning in 2018 and will have a significant impact on […]

October 18, 2017

Changes to Maryland Law Increase Ease, Efficiency, and Consistency in Family Law

Brooke I. Hettig

The Maryland General Assembly recently took several actions impacting domestic relations that will increase ease, efficiency, and consistency for those navigating the family court system. Domestic Violence Orders Admissible in Maryland Divorce Suits Protective orders (a form of domestic violence order) are designed to end and prevent abuse between family or household members.  Current or […]

May 26, 2017

On your way to the altar . . ., don’t forget to get married!

Anne (Jan) W. White

The trend in recent years has been toward greater creativity in marriage ceremonies, including locations, vows, and officiants. In personalizing the ceremony, it is important to keep in mind that the legal requirements for marriage are set forth in the laws of each jurisdiction, both as to the qualifications for a person to marry and […]